(No, I don’t claim that Daryush “Roosh” Valizadeh is a spook. He’s most likely not one. It’s just a funny meme, bro)
The American Central Intelligence Agency is unique in its ability to control and manufacture consciousness. While other intelligence agencies do the same stuff, their degree of success is highly variable and at any rate they’re no simply match to the CIA. No doubt, the Chinese MSS can psychologically manipulate the domestic Chinese public into thinking the ‘right’ thoughts and believing in the ‘right’ beliefs; but compared to the worldwide, long-term, all-pervasive propaganda emanating from the CIA, it’s almost like a blip on the radar.
We tend to distinguish between activist organizations operating in meatspace and ideological movements that ‘exist’ primarily in the realm of information. Think about the blog post you’re currently reading: what is it if not a means by which I convey information — defined in the broadest terms — from myself to you? This is an occurrence that, while technically occurring in meatspace (i.e. I’m sitting on my chair and typing on the keys on my keyboard), is for all intents and purposes an informational one. As such, Americans should distinguish between FBI infiltration of their real-life organizations (this, indeed, is confined to the US, as the FBI’s operations abroad are limited in scope) and CIA thought-influence or thought-control operations that are, by their very nature, omnipresent.
Thus, while the FBI has investigated GamerGate, there was no real option for “infiltration” there, as GamerGate was an event of the informational, rather than real-world activist, variety. If any element of the American Deep State had and has the potential to subvert the MRM, which exists almost exclusively in the world of ideas and not in the world of actions, it could only have been the CIA.
Now, the question is begged: would the CIA invest any resources into subverting the MRM? I assert that this is exactly what happened in the time period between 2011 and 2016. Some may say: “it sounds like a conspiracy theory.” But follow my logic and you’ll reach a similar conclusion. To reach the meaningful answer, you must ask the meaningful questions. The meaningful question in this case is: “what is the purpose of the CIA?” Technically, it’s gathering information. In practice, it’s controlling information. That’s not something I came while hooked to my tinfoil hat. That’s what US President Harry S. Truman said:
INDEPENDENCE, MO., Dec. 21 — I think it has become necessary to take another look at the purpose and operations of our Central Intelligence Agency—CIA. At least, I would like to submit here the original reason why I thought it necessary to organize this Agency during my Administration, what I expected it to do and how it was to operate as an arm of the President.
I think it is fairly obvious that by and large a President’s performance in office is as effective as the information he has and the information he gets. That is to say, that assuming the President himself possesses a knowledge of our history, a sensitive understanding of our institutions, and an insight into the needs and aspirations of the people, he needs to have available to him the most accurate and up-to-the-minute information on what is going on everywhere in the world, and particularly of the trends and developments in all the danger spots in the contest between East and West. This is an immense task and requires a special kind of an intelligence facility.
Of course, every President has available to him all the information gathered by the many intelligence agencies already in existence. The Departments of State, Defense, Commerce, Interior and others are constantly engaged in extensive information gathering and have done excellent work.
But their collective information reached the President all too frequently in conflicting conclusions. At times, the intelligence reports tended to be slanted to conform to established positions of a given department. This becomes confusing and what’s worse, such intelligence is of little use to a President in reaching the right decisions.
Therefore, I decided to set up a special organization charged with the collection of all intelligence reports from every available source, and to have those reports reach me as President without department “treatment” or interpretations.
I wanted and needed the information in its “natural raw” state and in as comprehensive a volume as it was practical for me to make full use of it. But the most important thing about this move was to guard against the chance of intelligence being used to influence or to lead the President into unwise decisions—and I thought it was necessary that the President do his own thinking and evaluating.
Since the responsibility for decision making was his—then he had to be sure that no information is kept from him for whatever reason at the discretion of any one department or agency, or that unpleasant facts be kept from him. There are always those who would want to shield a President from bad news or misjudgments to spare him from being “upset.”
For some time I have been disturbed by the way CIA has been diverted from its original assignment. It has become an operational and at times a policy-making arm of the Government. This has led to trouble and may have compounded our difficulties in several explosive areas.
I never had any thought that when I set up the CIA that it would be injected into peacetime cloak and dagger operations. Some of the complications and embarrassment I think we have experienced are in part attributable to the fact that this quiet intelligence arm of the President has been so removed from its intended role that it is being interpreted as a symbol of sinister and mysterious foreign intrigue—and a subject for cold war enemy propaganda.
With all the nonsense put out by Communist propaganda about “Yankee imperialism,” “exploitive capitalism,” “war-mongering,” “monopolists,” in their name-calling assault on the West, the last thing we needed was for the CIA to be seized upon as something akin to a subverting influence in the affairs of other people.
I well knew the first temporary director of the CIA, Adm. Souers, and the later permanent directors of the CIA, Gen. Hoyt Vandenberg and Allen Dulles. These were men of the highest character, patriotism and integrity—and I assume this is true of all those who continue in charge.
But there are now some searching questions that need to be answered. I, therefore, would like to see the CIA be restored to its original assignment as the intelligence arm of the President, and that whatever else it can properly perform in that special field—and that its operational duties be terminated or properly used elsewhere.
We have grown up as a nation, respected for our free institutions and for our ability to maintain a free and open society. There is something about the way the CIA has been functioning that is casting a shadow over our historic position and I feel that we need to correct it.
That was written in 1963; since then, things have become much worse, and the CIA has grown drastically more powerful. It’s now all-powerful, insofar as a human bureaucracy can be that.
But what are they up to, then? Answer: domestically as well as abroad, the CIA is interested in preserving the system under which it operates with so much power. Any threat to the system — be it a material threat or an ideological threat — must be neutralized or, if possible, turned from a threat to the system into a tool thereof. That is what subversion is all about: not necessarily the destruction of an organization or movement as much as their co-option for one’s own purposes. CIA is entryist. And if we look at the MRM circa 2011, I believe that it had the potential to ideologically disrupt the current system. In a sense, it has partially succeeded: while Feminism is still institutionally entrenched, its popularity all over the Western World, and especially among young and free-thinking American men, is today significantly lower than what it was a decade ago. The CIA, which has long been invested in Feminism (and to be precise: in Puritan-Feminism), would not want things to “get out of control.”
Hmmm, what could it do? Yeah, I have an idea.
Listen up. Even if the CIA had had absolutely no interest in the MRM before Elliot Rodgers’ aka The Supreme Gentleman’s Day of Retribution, it sure as hell has been interested in the MRM since that day. Yes, I know: “Rodgers was not an MRA, blah blah blah.” Right, but he was a manospherian, and the manosphere — contrary to Fidel “Bogen” Castro’s claims — was centered around MRA-ism. You could not have a manosphere without MRA-ism. The issue here is not “guilt by association,” but the fact that the manosphere was influenced by the MRM, and therefore, if you could determine what the MRM would be like, you could also influence the broader manosphere. My reasoning tells me that the CIA took over the manosphere by way of taking over the MRM. (To be sure, the alt-righters, the SJWs, and the Trad-Cons have been, and are now, also targeted) And it did so in order to protect the current system from the potential threat posed to it by the MRM.
Isn’t it “odd” how the mainstream MRM toes the American Deep State’s line about everything related to young sexuality to a T? Let me offer a scenario: the folks at CIA realized that an anti-Feminist backlash is fast approaching and is pretty much inevitable, and decided to ensure that this backlash wouldn’t in any way be detrimental to their own interests. Realizing that the MRM stands at the center of the brewing opposition to Feminism, they figured that they better get in control of the whole thing and steer it in a “safe” (from their perspective) direction. They would have to ensure that the MRM wouldn’t start addressing the real issues affecting men – the criminalization of our sexuality being the prime issue. Rather, the MRM was persuaded to become “Feminism for men.” Now you have fake MRAs whining about how “boys are disproportionately abused by Child Pornography.”
(As someone who watched his fair share of CP, I can tell you that most of the “””abused””” are females – and much of their “””abuse””” is actually “””self-abuse,””” i.e. it’s masturbation videos or just self-documented nudes. Feminists, who are generally anti-porn because they’re ugly and useless roasties and often dykes, probably realize it and are simply lying about it by pretending that “CP is cannibalisic murder” and so on; but the fake MRAs either don’t realize it because they are Blue Knights, or are disingenuously pushing the scripts fed to them by their agency)
One thing you have to understand about the Deep State is that it wants a Universal Age of Consent of 16. As long as there are countries with Ages of Consent set at 15 or 14 or 13 or 12 — some of those are in Europe — that completely discredits the American belief that “sex with 15-year-olds is child abuse.” It potentially discredits the entire Puritan-Feminist worldview. And one possible source of opposition to the worldwide Anglo-American Deep State program of Universal Age of Consent of 16 could have been the MRM. Well, this “threat” is all but neutralized now. The American MRM has been taken over by the CIA, and all MRM movements abroad fall under the sway of the American branch. The Anglo-American Deep State will push for a Universal Age of Consent of 16, and none of these fake MRAs in the US or abroad will say anything against it. The MRM has become Controlled Opposition.
How did the CIA do it? Honestly, I don’t know. But I can theorize that it did it through two different fronts: the “bottom,” which is comments’ sections and Twitter profiles; and the “top,” meaning the leadership stratum. Again, I don’t actually know what’s going on behind the scenes when it comes to the methods employed in the Deep State’s subversion of the MRM. This radical MGTOW guy is clearly autistic and generally super weird, as he talks about Illuminati and shit, but his claims — taken, of course, with a large grain of salt — about Elam are perhaps worth paying some attention to. Maybe.
However this subversion happened, the mainstream MRM is now completely in line with the interests of the Deep State; a few unfair laws are criticized, but beyond that, the MRM has nothing to offer. It doesn’t challenge the system of Puritan-Feminism in any substantial way, and in fact, it supports it. It’s simply controlled opposition.
And alongside a Universal Age of Consent, the American Deep State sets its eyes on universal ‘Child Porn’ legislation. It uses its network of international NGOs to achieve such ends. You, the skeptical reader, have to ask the following question: “who is funding all of the international NGOs involved in this scheme?” And the answer to that question must necessarily lead you back to the Deep State and the various global Foundations operating at its behest. For instance: The Ford Foundation is CIA. What a “coincidence” it is, then, that the mainstream MRM is on board and in line with the Deep State’s universal sex-criminalization initiatives. What a “surprise.” Nor is it any wonder that the mainstream MRM — supposedly a men’s movement — is full to the brim with women.
The American regime has no reason to worry about the fake MRAs, as they are its ‘alternative’ servants. In the event that Feminism collapses like a house of cards and forever loses its grip over society, it could then simply be replaced with a different kind of Feminist ideology – the “Feminism for men” that is the mainstream MRM. There’s no radical difference between Feminists who whine about “sexual objectification of women by men” and MRAs who whine about “sexual objectification of men by women.” There’s no difference at all between the two groups. They both share the same underlying feminized ideology, and both are vehicles for promoting the interests of the police state, the surveillance state, the prison state, and the spook state. If you’re living in a totalitarian sex-hostile Panopticon, does it really matter whether the wardens call themselves Feminists or MRAs? Arguably, it’s better that they call themselves Feminists, as then at least there’s less deception involved. It’s by far more honest.
Even the MGTOWs, supposedly the most radical wing of the manosphere, were essentially in line with the Deep State program, serving as a pressure release valve to prevent the system from being genuinely criticized and thereby undermined. The MGTOWs essentially say: “don’t waste your time trying to propose alternative systems to the modern system – your struggle is hopeless and futile, and you should just drop out. Go ghost. Go ghost!” How many MGTOWs have there been over the years? Plenty. Imagine if, instead of “going ghost,” they would have gone Male Sexualist – would our situation today, at least in terms of our legitimacy within the Overton Window, not have been infinitely better than it is now in actuality? Instead of reaching the right conclusions and independently coming up with an ideology like Male Sexualism, myriads of men have been directed towards the utter non-solution that is escapism. MGTOW is not altogether illegitimate, but if it led you to drop out of the struggle, it essentially betrayed you, and strengthened the enemy. Instead of fighting the meme war, the war of ideas, like I am doing by writing this blog, you were told to flee the scene and disappear.
No wonder that the MGTOWs on Reddit banned Holocaust21. Look: why is Tom Grauer even needed in the first place? Am I the smartest man on Earth? Lol – I’m not even the smartest man in my own room, and I’m alone in the room! Seriously though, did we have to wait until 2018 for an ideology like Male Sexualism to be invented by a perverted 23-year-old troll? It pisses me off that I literally invented a new ideology, when it’s men who are much more talented, creative, intelligent, and overall competent than myself who should have invented this ideology – and at that, they should’ve done it a very long time ago. I didn’t even want to become “the leader.” Yet, that happened, and it happened because you were prevented by the system from figuring out such a simple and obvious notion as “the sexuality of men is being criminalized, and that is inherently detrimental to our interests as men, so we must formulate a pro-male-sexuality worldview that absolutely rejects the criminalization of our sexuality, in order to oppose this criminalization.” The MRAs, the PUAs, and the MGTOWs – they have become useless, and we Male Sexualists are going to replace them all; we are the real opposition to the system.
The MRAs did not propose any substantial changes to the current system. The PUAs taught you how to charm women (and scammed money off of you with their “seminars”), which — to be clear — is not a bad thing; and yet, that stuff simply doesn’t address the fundamental problems within the contemporary system. And the MGTOWs told you to “go ghost” instead of going nuclear. The MGTOWs want you to rant along with them about the female sex (and to be sure: there are more than enough reasons to do that, and I’m myself am a more extreme “misogynist” than most of you), while saying almost nothing about the system set up to criminalize male sexuality; in fact, the MGTOWs don’t particularly care about the criminalization of male sexuality, because they are usually low sex-drive oldfags. (By the way, I heard it claimed that the person who invented MGTOW, not sure which one it was, “happened to be” a homosexual – totally “shocking,” right?) These 3 wings of the old manosphere all worked in unison to sustain the system by preventing you from thinking out actual alternatives to it. It’s no surprise that they respond so negatively and so viciously to Male Sexualism, the only ideology that actually seeks to undermine and ultimately topple the entirety of the contemporary system. Manosphere 1.0 was essentially the Deep State’s wet dream: totally Controlled Opposition. We, on the other hand, are the Deep State’s nightmare: absolute, uncompromising, indomitable opposition. We are the Men’s Muqawama (Resistance) Movement.
When I say straightforwardly: “legalize rape, pedophilia, and child prostitution,” I am accused by the CIA-run MRM of being myself an agent provocateur, a Feminist impersonator, a spook, and who knows what else. That is to be expected. They want you to keep doing what you’ve been doing so far. They want you to forever remain a Controlled Opposition: without original ideas, without self-confidence, and without a sense of hope. They want you to be timid and hesitant and depressed. But get this: if we succeed in spreading the Male Sexualist gospel to masses of men worldwide, we will be remembered as the pioneers who initiated the collapse of the modern Puritan-Feminist system and its replacement with a genuinely pro-male system. That’s because ideas materialize into reality, and while currently we don’t have the power to make policy, we do have the power to formulate and spread ideas that may eventually translate into concrete reality. That is our task: winning the war of ideas. Absolute Muqawama.
The 3 ideologies of manosphere 1.0 — MRA-ism, PUA-ism, and MGTOW-ism — do not offer any actual resistance against the current Deep State programme. If I’m wrong, then please, please, explain to me in what concrete sense these 3 ideologies resist the ever-escalating criminalization of our sexuality. It is only the 4th ideology known as Male Sexualism that truly opposes Puritan-Feminism. And I want you to understand that it was not, and is not, my intention to be a “leader” with my own army of “followers”; my intention was, and remains, to spread my ideas successfully, so that eventually they will be adopted by millions of men worldwide, and I certainly don’t expect these millions of men to know who I am or to see me as their “leader” or whatever. As far as I’m concerned, I could be assassinated tomorrow. It is the ideas that must be spread.
Ultimately, it doesn’t matter if the CIA literally took over the MRM by hook and by crook, or only figuratively took over it as the old-school MRAs all willingly and independently subjected themselves to the Deep State’s agenda of sex-hostility and pedohysteria. Practically, the result is the same: the MRM is now a tool of the Deep State. And what I want is to convert the many men who will gradually grow disillusioned with the old-school MRM into a novel ideology — and a new mass movement — that is truly revolutionary and truly “threatening” from the perspective of our adversaries. We must take the fight into the enemy’s territory. And we will win.